Trikafta vs Cosentyx
Side-by-side drug price comparison from Medicare Part D data
Verdict
Cosentyx costs 74% less per claim than Trikafta ($3616.00 vs $13935.00). Trikafta has a generic alternative available. Total Medicare spending: Trikafta at $3.5B vs Cosentyx at $3.1B.
| Metric | Trikafta | Cosentyx |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Cost per Claim Average cost Medicare pays per prescription claim | $13,935 | $3,616* |
| Total Medicare Spending Total Medicare Part D spending on this drug | $3.5B | $3.1B |
| Total Claims | 248,000 | 864,000 |
| Year-over-Year Change Price change from prior year (lower is better for patients) | 18.4% | 8.9%* |
| Generic Available | Yes | Yes |
| Condition | Cystic Fibrosis | Autoimmune Diseases |
| Total Beneficiaries | 18,000 | 120,000 |
Cosentyx costs 74% less per claim than Trikafta ($3616.00 vs $13935.00). Trikafta has a generic alternative available. Total Medicare spending: Trikafta at $3.5B vs Cosentyx at $3.1B.