Skip to main content
DrugPrice

Linzess vs Xifaxan

Side-by-side cost comparison based on Medicare Part D data

Linzess costs 64% less per claim than Xifaxan ($180.00 vs $498.00). A generic version of Linzess is also available, which may reduce costs further.

Cost Per Claim

Linzess$180.00
Xifaxan$498.00

Medicare Spending

Linzess$876.0M
Xifaxan$1.2B

Beneficiaries

Linzess580,000
Xifaxan298,000

Annual Cost Per Patient

Linzess$1,510.00
Xifaxan$4,141.00

Full Comparison

MetricLinzessXifaxan
Avg Cost Per Claim$180.00$498.00
Total Medicare Spending$876.0M$1.2B
Total Beneficiaries580,000298,000
Total Claims4,860,0002,480,000
Annual Cost/Patient$1,510.00$4,141.00
Year-over-Year Change+6.4%+4.8%
Generic AvailableYesYes
Patent ExpirationJan 31, 2023Jan 31, 2023
ManufacturerAbbVieSalix/Bausch
ConditionGI/Acid RefluxGI/Acid Reflux
Generic NameLinaclotideRifaximin

Linzess vs Xifaxan: What the Data Shows

Linzess (Linaclotide) and Xifaxan (Rifaximin) are both used to treat gi/acid reflux. Based on Medicare Part D data, Linzess costs $180.00 per claim, which is 64% less than Xifaxan at $498.00 per claim.

Medicare spent $876.0M on Linzess and $1.2B on Xifaxan. In terms of patient reach, Linzess serves more beneficiaries (580,000 vs 298,000).

Year-over-year spending changed +6.4% for Linzess and +4.8% for Xifaxan.

Both drugs have generic versions available. Patients should discuss generic alternatives with their pharmacist to reduce out-of-pocket costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Linzess is cheaper at $180.00 per claim, compared to $498.00 for Xifaxan. That makes Linzess about 64% less expensive per claim based on Medicare Part D data.

Yes, both Linzess and Xifaxan are used to treat gi/acid reflux. Your doctor can help determine which medication is more appropriate for your specific situation.

Both drugs have generic versions available. Generic Linaclotide and generic Rifaximin can offer significant cost savings — typically 80-95% less than the brand name.

Medicare Part D spent $876.0M on Linzess covering 580,000 beneficiaries, and $1.2B on Xifaxan covering 298,000 beneficiaries.

Explore Further

Cost data reflects Medicare Part D spending and may not represent retail pharmacy prices. Average cost per claim represents the total drug cost (not patient out-of-pocket) divided by total claims. This comparison is informational only and should not replace medical advice.