Ocrevus vs Repatha
Side-by-side drug price comparison from Medicare Part D data
Verdict
Repatha costs 97% less per claim than Ocrevus ($757.00 vs $23635.00). Ocrevus has a generic alternative available. Total Medicare spending: Ocrevus at $3.5B vs Repatha at $2.6B.
| Metric | Ocrevus | Repatha |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Cost per Claim Average cost Medicare pays per prescription claim | $23,635 | $757* |
| Total Medicare Spending Total Medicare Part D spending on this drug | $3.5B | $2.6B |
| Total Claims | 148,000 | 3,420,000 |
| Year-over-Year Change Price change from prior year (lower is better for patients) | 16.5%* | 24.6% |
| Generic Available | Yes | No |
| Condition | Multiple Sclerosis | High Cholesterol |
| Total Beneficiaries | 62,000 | 398,000 |
Repatha costs 97% less per claim than Ocrevus ($757.00 vs $23635.00). Ocrevus has a generic alternative available. Total Medicare spending: Ocrevus at $3.5B vs Repatha at $2.6B.
Explore More
The side-by-side above pulls the CMS Medicare Part D Drug Spending data data for both Ocrevus and Repatha. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for Ocrevus versus Repatha, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
For households or analysts using this comparison as a decision input, the right framing is usually not "which is better" in aggregate but "which is better for the specific decision in front of you." CMS Medicare Part D Drug Spending data captures the raw data; the framing depends on whether the question is investment, residency, planning, or research.
Source: CMS Medicare Part D Spending, 2026.