Skip to main content
DrugPrice

Epidiolex vs Vimpat

Side-by-side cost comparison based on Medicare Part D data

Vimpat costs 85% less per claim than Epidiolex ($270.00 vs $1,839.00). A generic version of Vimpat is also available, which may reduce costs further.

Cost Per Claim

Epidiolex$1,839.00
Vimpat$270.00

Medicare Spending

Epidiolex$456.0M
Vimpat$876.0M

Beneficiaries

Epidiolex28,000
Vimpat398,000

Annual Cost Per Patient

Epidiolex$16,286.00
Vimpat$2,201.00

Full Comparison

MetricEpidiolexVimpat
Avg Cost Per Claim$1,839.00$270.00
Total Medicare Spending$456.0M$876.0M
Total Beneficiaries28,000398,000
Total Claims248,0003,240,000
Annual Cost/Patient$16,286.00$2,201.00
Year-over-Year Change+18.4%+4.2%
Generic AvailableYesYes
Patent ExpirationJan 31, 2023Jan 31, 2023
ManufacturerJazz PharmaceuticalsUCB
ConditionSeizure/EpilepsySeizure/Epilepsy
Generic NameCannabidiolLacosamide

Epidiolex vs Vimpat: What the Data Shows

Epidiolex (Cannabidiol) and Vimpat (Lacosamide) are both used to treat seizure/epilepsy. Based on Medicare Part D data, Vimpat costs $270.00 per claim, which is 85% less than Epidiolex at $1,839.00 per claim.

Medicare spent $456.0M on Epidiolex and $876.0M on Vimpat. In terms of patient reach, Vimpat serves more beneficiaries (398,000 vs 28,000).

Year-over-year spending changed +18.4% for Epidiolex and +4.2% for Vimpat. Epidiolex saw significant spending growth, suggesting increased utilization or price increases.

Both drugs have generic versions available. Patients should discuss generic alternatives with their pharmacist to reduce out-of-pocket costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Vimpat is cheaper at $270.00 per claim, compared to $1,839.00 for Epidiolex. That makes Vimpat about 85% less expensive per claim based on Medicare Part D data.

Yes, both Epidiolex and Vimpat are used to treat seizure/epilepsy. Your doctor can help determine which medication is more appropriate for your specific situation.

Both drugs have generic versions available. Generic Cannabidiol and generic Lacosamide can offer significant cost savings — typically 80-95% less than the brand name.

Medicare Part D spent $456.0M on Epidiolex covering 28,000 beneficiaries, and $876.0M on Vimpat covering 398,000 beneficiaries.

Explore Further

Cost data reflects Medicare Part D spending and may not represent retail pharmacy prices. Average cost per claim represents the total drug cost (not patient out-of-pocket) divided by total claims. This comparison is informational only and should not replace medical advice.